[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181211205444.rpfn5cmsndy4y2lv@ninjato>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:54:44 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Parthiban Nallathambi <pn@...x.de>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, afaerber@...e.de,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...ietech.com, thomas.liau@...ions-semi.com,
linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] i2c: Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S700
I2C support
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:04:47AM +0100, Parthiban Nallathambi wrote:
> Add S700 to the list of devices supported by Owl I2C driver.
>
> Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S700 I2C driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi <pn@...x.de>
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Rob, is this okay or should we drop this patch and update the DT to
contain first the s700 compatible and then s900 as fallback?
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> index 96b4572e6d9c..b6b5a495118b 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-owl.c
> @@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ static int owl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id owl_i2c_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "actions,s700-i2c" },
> { .compatible = "actions,s900-i2c" },
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
> --
> 2.17.2
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists