[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9c7cbe1-eef3-40ad-de62-8194df12ca20@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:57:32 -0500
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ACPI / OSL: Allow PCI to be disabled
On 12/11/2018 4:46 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:37 PM Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/11/2018 12:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:13:14PM +0000, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>>> Getting ready to allow PCI to be disabled with ACPI enabled. Stub
>>>> out calls that depend on PCI.
>>>
>>> I think you want to skip building at least all of hwpci.c if CONFIG_PCI
>>> is disabled. Or replace that whole stiking pile of crap with something
>>> resembling C code..
>>>
>>
>> I can give it a try but I'm under the impression that we don't touch
>> ACPICA code in general.
>>
>> Feel free to correct me.
>
> We don't as a rule, but depending on what the patch looks like, we
> might not follow the rule this time.
>
OK. Good to know. I'll take a stab at it.
> I wonder though what we do if some AML wants to access PCI config
> space via an opregion in there. Have you thought about that?
>
Return an error.
AFAIK, ACPI spec says that AML code running on non-existing op-regions to be
discarded last time I checked.
I know Linux is noisy about these.
I did boot QEMU without CONFIG_PCI. There was a bunch of ACPI errors reported
during boot as expected but boot succeeded. There was no hard lockup/failure.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists