linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm, memory_hotplug: Initialize struct pages for the full memory section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:24:15 +0000
From:   Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To:     Zaslonko Mikhail <zaslonko@...ux.bm.com>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@...ux.ibm.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Pavel.Tatashin@...rosoft.com,
        schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm, memory_hotplug: Initialize struct pages for the
 full memory section

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 04:17:34PM +0100, Zaslonko Mikhail wrote:
>
>
>On 11.12.2018 10:49, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:24:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Mon 10-12-18 14:07:12, Mikhail Zaslonko wrote:
>>>> If memory end is not aligned with the sparse memory section boundary, the
>>>> mapping of such a section is only partly initialized.
>>>
>>> It would be great to mention how you can end up in the situation like
>>> this(a user provided memmap or a strange HW). 
>>>
>>>> This may lead to
>>>> VM_BUG_ON due to uninitialized struct page access from
>>>> is_mem_section_removable() or test_pages_in_a_zone() function triggered by
>>>> memory_hotplug sysfs handlers:
>>>>
>>>>  page:000003d082008000 is uninitialized and poisoned
>>>>  page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
>>>>  Call Trace:
>>>>  ([<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160)
>>>>   [<00000000008f15c4>] show_valid_zones+0x5c/0x190
>>>>   [<00000000008cf9c4>] dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70
>>>>   [<0000000000463ad0>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148
>>>>   [<00000000003e4194>] seq_read+0x204/0x480
>>>>   [<00000000003b53ea>] __vfs_read+0x32/0x178
>>>>   [<00000000003b55b2>] vfs_read+0x82/0x138
>>>>   [<00000000003b5be2>] ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0
>>>>   [<0000000000b86ba0>] system_call+0xdc/0x2d8
>>>>  Last Breaking-Event-Address:
>>>>   [<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160
>>>>  Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
>>>>
>>>> Fix the problem by initializing the last memory section of the highest zone
>>>> in memmap_init_zone() till the very end, even if it goes beyond the zone
>>>> end.
>>>
>>> Why do we need to restrict this to the highest zone? In other words, why
>>> cannot we do what I was suggesting earlier [1]. What does prevent other
>>> zones to have an incomplete section boundary?
>>>
>>> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105183533.GQ4361@dhcp22.suse.cz
>>>
>> 
>> I tried to go through the original list and make myself familiar with
>> the bug.
>> 
>> Confused why initialize the *last* end_pfn could fix this, since
>> is_mem_section_removable() will iterate on each page of a section. This
>> means we need to initialize all the pages left in the section.
>That's exactly what the fix does. We initialize all the pages left in 
>the section.
>

You are right, I misunderstand your code.

>> 
>> One way to fix this in my mind is to record the last pfn in mem_section.
>Do you mean last initialized pfn? I guess we have agreed upon that the 
>entire section should be initialized.  

Well, that would be great.

>
>> This could be done in memory_preset(), since after that we may assume
>> the section is full. Not sure whether you would like it.
>> 

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me