[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181211055001.GE21466@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:50:02 +0900
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, dhowells@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
dyoung@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
prudo@...ux.ibm.com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
james.morse@....com, bhsharma@...hat.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 16/16] arm64: kexec_file: add kaslr support
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:19:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 02:52:55PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Adding "kaslr-seed" to dtb enables triggering kaslr, or kernel virtual
> > address randomization, at secondary kernel boot. We always do this as
> > it will have no harm on kaslr-incapable kernel.
> >
> > We don't have any "switch" to turn off this feature directly, but still
> > can suppress it by passing "nokaslr" as a kernel boot argument.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> > index ab296b98d633..a0a730bd9be6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> > #include <linux/libfdt.h>
> > #include <linux/memblock.h>
> > #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> > +#include <linux/random.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/string.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > @@ -28,6 +29,7 @@
> > #define FDT_PSTR_INITRD_STA "linux,initrd-start"
> > #define FDT_PSTR_INITRD_END "linux,initrd-end"
> > #define FDT_PSTR_BOOTARGS "bootargs"
> > +#define FDT_PSTR_KASLR_SEED "kaslr-seed"
> >
> > const struct kexec_file_ops * const kexec_file_loaders[] = {
> > &kexec_image_ops,
> > @@ -46,11 +48,38 @@ int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
> > return kexec_image_post_load_cleanup_default(image);
> > }
> >
> > +/* crng needs to have been initialized for providing kaslr-seed */
> > +static int random_ready;
> > +
> > +static void random_ready_notified(struct random_ready_callback *unused)
> > +{
> > + random_ready = 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct random_ready_callback random_ready_cb = {
> > + .func = random_ready_notified,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static __init int init_random_ready_cb(void)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = add_random_ready_callback(&random_ready_cb);
> > + if (ret == -EALREADY)
> > + random_ready = 1;
> > + else if (ret)
> > + pr_warn("failed to add a callback for random_ready\n");
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +late_initcall(init_random_ready_cb)
>
> Why can't we just call crng_ready()?
because crng_ready() is locally defined in drivers/char/random.c.
Instead, I'd like to use
wait_for_random_bytes();
value = get_random_u64();
> > +
> > static int setup_dtb(struct kimage *image,
> > unsigned long initrd_load_addr, unsigned long initrd_len,
> > char *cmdline, void *dtb)
> > {
> > int nodeoffset;
> > + u64 value;
> > int ret;
> >
> > nodeoffset = fdt_path_offset(dtb, "/chosen");
> > @@ -106,12 +135,27 @@ static int setup_dtb(struct kimage *image,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + /* add kaslr-seed */
> > + ret = fdt_delprop(dtb, nodeoffset, FDT_PSTR_KASLR_SEED);
> > + if (ret && (ret != -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (random_ready) {
> > + get_random_bytes(&value, sizeof(value));
>
> get_random_u64() ?
OK.
> > + ret = fdt_setprop_u64(dtb, nodeoffset, FDT_PSTR_KASLR_SEED,
> > + value);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return (ret == -FDT_ERR_NOSPACE ? -ENOMEM : -EINVAL);
> > + } else {
>
> Wouldn't we be better off preserving the previous seed here, if it was
> present?
While there's no guarantee that dtb won't be (partially) broken
on failure, I will let this function return successfully
by deleting succeeding fdt_delprop().
> > + pr_notice("kaslr-seed won't be fed\n");
>
> "fed" is probably not the right word here.
=> won't be *provided* on kexec?
-Takahiro Akashi
> Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists