[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1544570173.185366.397.camel@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:16:13 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Cc: kernel-team@...com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blkcg: handle dying request_queue when associating a
blkg
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 18:03 -0500, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> index 6bd0619a7d6e..c30661ddc873 100644
> --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
> +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,12 @@ static struct blkcg_gq *blkg_create(struct blkcg *blkcg,
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> lockdep_assert_held(&q->queue_lock);
>
> + /* request_queue is dying, do not create/recreate a blkg */
> + if (blk_queue_dying(q)) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_free_blkg;
> + }
> +
> /* blkg holds a reference to blkcg */
> if (!css_tryget_online(&blkcg->css)) {
> ret = -ENODEV;
What prevents that the queue state changes after blk_queue_dying() has returned
and before blkg_create() returns? Are you sure you don't need to protect this
code with a blk_queue_enter() / blk_queue_exit() pair?
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists