[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181211090829.GA471@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:08:29 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...e.de, keescook@...omium.org,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + panic-avoid-the-extra-noise-dmesg.patch added to -mm tree
Adding Frederic,
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/11/304
On (12/11/18 16:32), Feng Tang wrote:
> Here is the v1 patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/11/304
>
> And actually no one ruled out the v1 patch :), I don't have HW of other
> archs like arm/ppc, so I just read some of the arch code, and found
> most of them use the similar flow like x86, that's why I chosed to
> finding a soluton inside panic.c itself.
Interesting. So if the problem is that we need to clear cpu bit in
several cpumaks (e.g. nohz.idle_cpus_mask) when we stop_this_cpu(),
then I'd say let's clear cpumasks which are needed to be clear (doing
some of the things which sched_cpu_dying() does, except that we need
it on !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU systems too). The idea of notifiers also looks
interesting.
x86 and sched gurus, can you please help?
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists