[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181211094938.3mykr3n3tp6rfz4p@master>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 09:49:38 +0000
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@...ux.ibm.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Pavel.Tatashin@...rosoft.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm, memory_hotplug: Initialize struct pages for the
full memory section
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:24:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Mon 10-12-18 14:07:12, Mikhail Zaslonko wrote:
>> If memory end is not aligned with the sparse memory section boundary, the
>> mapping of such a section is only partly initialized.
>
>It would be great to mention how you can end up in the situation like
>this(a user provided memmap or a strange HW).
>
>> This may lead to
>> VM_BUG_ON due to uninitialized struct page access from
>> is_mem_section_removable() or test_pages_in_a_zone() function triggered by
>> memory_hotplug sysfs handlers:
>>
>> page:000003d082008000 is uninitialized and poisoned
>> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
>> Call Trace:
>> ([<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160)
>> [<00000000008f15c4>] show_valid_zones+0x5c/0x190
>> [<00000000008cf9c4>] dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70
>> [<0000000000463ad0>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148
>> [<00000000003e4194>] seq_read+0x204/0x480
>> [<00000000003b53ea>] __vfs_read+0x32/0x178
>> [<00000000003b55b2>] vfs_read+0x82/0x138
>> [<00000000003b5be2>] ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0
>> [<0000000000b86ba0>] system_call+0xdc/0x2d8
>> Last Breaking-Event-Address:
>> [<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
>>
>> Fix the problem by initializing the last memory section of the highest zone
>> in memmap_init_zone() till the very end, even if it goes beyond the zone
>> end.
>
>Why do we need to restrict this to the highest zone? In other words, why
>cannot we do what I was suggesting earlier [1]. What does prevent other
>zones to have an incomplete section boundary?
>
>[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105183533.GQ4361@dhcp22.suse.cz
>
I tried to go through the original list and make myself familiar with
the bug.
Confused why initialize the *last* end_pfn could fix this, since
is_mem_section_removable() will iterate on each page of a section. This
means we need to initialize all the pages left in the section.
One way to fix this in my mind is to record the last pfn in mem_section.
This could be done in memory_preset(), since after that we may assume
the section is full. Not sure whether you would like it.
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists