linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:16:20 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 08:52:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
>   arch/arm64/Kconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   ce8c80c536da ("arm64: Add workaround for Cortex-A76 erratum 1286807")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   a457b0f7f50d ("arm64: Add configuration/documentation for Cortex-A76 erratum 1165522")
> 
> from the arm64 tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

It looks fine. Thanks Stephen.

-- 
Catalin