linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add devicetree support for ad5933

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ba95fa0946962b113760e157a91b81e43f468c1.camel@analog.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:31:23 +0000
From:   "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
To:     "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "kernel-usp@...glegroups.com" <kernel-usp@...glegroups.com>,
        "lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "knaack.h@....de" <knaack.h@....de>,
        "Popa, Stefan Serban" <StefanSerban.Popa@...log.com>,
        "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "Bogdan, Dragos" <Dragos.Bogdan@...log.com>,
        "pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        "marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com" <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add devicetree support for ad5933

On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 21:27 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 22:10:43 +0100
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 04:56:45PM -0200, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> > > Parts of this work came from contributions of Alexandru Ardelean and
> > > Dragos Bogdan, I and Gabriel would like to thank for the insights
> > > provided by their previous patches. Maybe it would be the case to add
> > > them as co-authors of this patch set.  
> > 
> > That's what the Co-developed-by: tag is for, please use it :)
> > 
> 
> Alexandru, Dragos.  No idea how involved you were in the actual
> patch...
> 
> Work amongst amongst the 4 of you what you would like to do and
> let us know!
> 

Hey,

To give a bit of context, I sent some patches some time ago that deal with
this, but haven't had time to re-spin them [based on Jonathan's comments].

I've discussed with Dragos.
From our side, any version that is decided with respect to the `Co-
developed-by:` tag is fine. i.e. we don't need to be mentioned in the
commits.

I hope this is a sufficiently good answer [for the whole legal stuff].

> Patches look fine, though we need to let the DT maintainers have a few
> days at least to get around to looking if they want to (they don't always
> on simple bindings like these).
> 

Thanks
Alex

> Jonathan
>