[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <873573ba-4d15-07c8-3fcf-ccf36eee14f1@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:44:32 +0100
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
"H. J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
x32@...ldd.debian.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Can we drop upstream Linux x32 support?
On 12/11/18 11:37 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Note that OpenJDK (well, Hotspot) has its own 32-bit pointer support for
> the Java heap (compressed oops), so only the native code parts (and JNI)
> benefit from x32 anyway.
Yeah, I was actually only talking about this single commit by me to add
Zero build support for x86_64-linux-gnux32:
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/9ce4a0d718c7
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@...ian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists