[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d0q8mf84.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:15:39 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To: Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
"devicetree\@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "gregkh\@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Douglas <adouglas@...ence.com>,
"jbergsagel\@ti.com" <jbergsagel@...com>,
"nsekhar\@ti.com" <nsekhar@...com>, "nm\@ti.com" <nm@...com>,
Suresh Punnoose <sureshp@...ence.com>,
"peter.chen\@nxp.com" <peter.chen@....com>,
Pawel Jez <pjez@...ence.com>, Rahul Kumar <kurahul@...ence.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 2/2] usb:cdns3 Add Cadence USB3 DRD Driver
Hi,
Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com> writes:
>>I think what Felipe meant was to only combine the gadget driver code into one patch.
>>
>>The series could be split into 6 patches like so.
>>-dt binding
>>-pci glue
>>-core driver
>>-host driver
>>-gadget driver
>>-drd driver
>
> Felipe wrote:
> "
> Frankly, I don't understand why this is a series. It's a single driver
> and splitting it into a series just makes it more difficult to review,
> actually.
>
> Sure, a single patch will be large, but there's no way to have a
> functional driver until all patches are applied, anyway.
> "
>
> Felipe should I split this driver as suggested by Roger ?.
> Now it's very big patch but it's still a single driver.
don't bother. It's far easier to review as it is.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists