[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQ8RjUkc57CWi_rnLopGSQQBtgerYJO+F7_0MD+p=NFxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:01:09 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kbuild: generate asm-generic wrappers if mandatory
headers are missing
Hi Sam,
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 3:06 AM Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:28:05PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Some time ago, Sam pointed out a certain degree of overwrap between
> > generic-y and mandatory-y. (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/10/121)
> >
> > I a bit tweaked the meaning of mandatory-y; now it defines the minimum
> > set of ASM headers that all architectures must have.
> >
> > If arch does not have specific implementation of a mandatory header,
> > Kbuild will let it fallback to the asm-generic one by automatically
> > generating a wrapper. This will allow to drop lots of redundant
> > generic-y defines.
> >
> > Previously, "mandatory" was used in the context of UAPI, but I guess
> > this can be extended to kernel space ASM headers.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>
> Nice work!
>
> For the full series:
> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
>
> Have you considered to warn if generic-y contains a header listed
> in mandatory-y - to prevent that they sneak back in.
> And to catch when we lift a header from available to mandatory.
Yes, I also thought of this,
and probably we should do it.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists