lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181211151644.313948188@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:40:21 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 002/118] media: cec: check for non-OK/NACK conditions while claiming a LA

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 55623b4169056d7bb493d1c6f715991f8db67302 ]

During the configuration phase of a CEC adapter it is trying to claim a
free logical address by polling.

However, the code doesn't check if there were errors other than OK or NACK,
those are just treated as if the poll was NACKed.

Instead check for such errors and retry the poll. And if the problem persists
then don't claim this LA since there is something weird going on.

Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c b/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c
index dd8bad74a1f0..a537e518384b 100644
--- a/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c
+++ b/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c
@@ -1167,6 +1167,8 @@ static int cec_config_log_addr(struct cec_adapter *adap,
 {
 	struct cec_log_addrs *las = &adap->log_addrs;
 	struct cec_msg msg = { };
+	const unsigned int max_retries = 2;
+	unsigned int i;
 	int err;
 
 	if (cec_has_log_addr(adap, log_addr))
@@ -1175,19 +1177,44 @@ static int cec_config_log_addr(struct cec_adapter *adap,
 	/* Send poll message */
 	msg.len = 1;
 	msg.msg[0] = (log_addr << 4) | log_addr;
-	err = cec_transmit_msg_fh(adap, &msg, NULL, true);
 
-	/*
-	 * While trying to poll the physical address was reset
-	 * and the adapter was unconfigured, so bail out.
-	 */
-	if (!adap->is_configuring)
-		return -EINTR;
+	for (i = 0; i < max_retries; i++) {
+		err = cec_transmit_msg_fh(adap, &msg, NULL, true);
 
-	if (err)
-		return err;
+		/*
+		 * While trying to poll the physical address was reset
+		 * and the adapter was unconfigured, so bail out.
+		 */
+		if (!adap->is_configuring)
+			return -EINTR;
+
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 
-	if (msg.tx_status & CEC_TX_STATUS_OK)
+		/*
+		 * The message was aborted due to a disconnect or
+		 * unconfigure, just bail out.
+		 */
+		if (msg.tx_status & CEC_TX_STATUS_ABORTED)
+			return -EINTR;
+		if (msg.tx_status & CEC_TX_STATUS_OK)
+			return 0;
+		if (msg.tx_status & CEC_TX_STATUS_NACK)
+			break;
+		/*
+		 * Retry up to max_retries times if the message was neither
+		 * OKed or NACKed. This can happen due to e.g. a Lost
+		 * Arbitration condition.
+		 */
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If we are unable to get an OK or a NACK after max_retries attempts
+	 * (and note that each attempt already consists of four polls), then
+	 * then we assume that something is really weird and that it is not a
+	 * good idea to try and claim this logical address.
+	 */
+	if (i == max_retries)
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.19.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ