lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:21:46 +1100
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        jannh@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] seq_buf: Make seq_buf_puts() null-terminate the buffer

Hi Steve,

Friendly ping :)

Do you mind picking this one up for 4.21 ?

cheers

Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> writes:
> Currently seq_buf_puts() will happily create a non null-terminated
> string for you in the buffer. This is particularly dangerous if the
> buffer is on the stack.
>
> For example:
>
>   char buf[8];
>   char secret = "secret";
>   struct seq_buf s;
>
>   seq_buf_init(&s, buf, sizeof(buf));
>   seq_buf_puts(&s, "foo");
>   printk("Message is %s\n", buf);
>
> Can result in:
>
>   Message is fooªªªªªsecret
>
> We could require all users to memset() their buffer to zero before
> use. But that seems likely to be forgotten and lead to bugs.
>
> Instead we can change seq_buf_puts() to always leave the buffer in a
> null-terminated state.
>
> The only downside is that this makes the buffer 1 character smaller
> for seq_buf_puts(), but that seems like a good trade off.
>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> ---
>  lib/seq_buf.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> v2: Fix NULL/null terminology.
>
> diff --git a/lib/seq_buf.c b/lib/seq_buf.c
> index 11f2ae0f9099..6aabb609dd87 100644
> --- a/lib/seq_buf.c
> +++ b/lib/seq_buf.c
> @@ -144,9 +144,13 @@ int seq_buf_puts(struct seq_buf *s, const char *str)
>  
>  	WARN_ON(s->size == 0);
>  
> +	/* Add 1 to len for the trailing null byte which must be there */
> +	len += 1;
> +
>  	if (seq_buf_can_fit(s, len)) {
>  		memcpy(s->buffer + s->len, str, len);
> -		s->len += len;
> +		/* Don't count the trailing null byte against the capacity */
> +		s->len += len - 1;
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  	seq_buf_set_overflow(s);
> -- 
> 2.17.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists