lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:49:11 +0000
From:   Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: light: isl29018: update power
 supply name

Hi, Fabio

From Anson's iPhone 6

> 
> We should not break existing dtbs, so in this case just keep the
> existing supply name and you could add the new optional vdda supply as
> per the datasheet.

        Since the datasheet of isl29018 states the vdda and vddd MUST be shorted externally, and the later chips even remove vdda, ONLY has vdd one supply, so I think adding vdda does NOT make enough sense. Looks like the vcc they added is just for prepare, the driver did NOT support regulator operation at that time. So can we just use vcc in driver accordingly? Do we have to use the name “VDD” in datasheet for regulator name?

Anson.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ