linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk: Remove print_prefix() calls with NULL buffer.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 14:16:26 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Remove print_prefix() calls with NULL buffer.

On Wed 2018-12-12 11:20:29, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (12/11/18 18:49), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > 
> > We can save lines/size by removing print_prefix() with buf == NULL.
> > This patch makes no functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> 
> Looks good to me,
> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>

Thanks. I have pushed the patch into printk.git, for-4.21 branch.


> Shouldn't this also have "Suggested-by: Petr Mladek" ?

I did not add this tag. This idea comes from some other Tetsuo's patch.

Best Regards,
Petr