linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] media: usb: pwc: Don't use coherent DMA buffers for ISO transfer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:01:23 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey.kornilov@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        Mike Isely <isely@...ox.com>,
        Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
        keiichiw@...omium.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] media: usb: pwc: Don't use coherent DMA buffers
 for ISO transfer

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:56:22 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> Can someone please take this patch or at least say what's wrong with it
> if you have a problem?
> 
> Matwey has been patiently pinging us once every other week for over a
> month asking for a reply. I've already given my Reviewed-by from a
> tracing perspective.
> 
> Ignoring patches is not a friendly gesture.
> 

Nevermind, it appears that v5 is still under discussion.

Matwey, does v6 address the comments made in v5?

-- Steve