linux-kernel - RFC [PATCH 0/1] Fix lockdep false positive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181212022506.171936-1-dbasehore@chromium.org>
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:25:05 -0800
From:   Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
To:     peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, will.deacon@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
Subject: RFC [PATCH 0/1] Fix lockdep false positive

I'm not sure if I'm breaking any detection with this patch since I
haven't looked at that lockdep code before. I do know that the unlock
order for locks with a nest lock should not matter, though.
Specifically, you should be able to unlock the nest lock followed by
all the locks nested underneath it.

Derek Basehore (1):
  locking/lockdep: Fix nest lock warning on unlock

 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.0.rc2.403.gdbc3b29805-goog