linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for v4.20-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:16:58 -0800
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, david@...morbit.com,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for v4.20-rc6

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 05:58:18AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 11:24:48AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Honestly, I really wish you simply wouldn't send me "xfs" fixes that
> > aren't really xfs-specific at all.
> > 
> > All the splice patches (and honestly, I feel some of the iomap ones
> > too) that have come in through the xfs tree should have been handled
> > separately as actual VFS patches. Or at least had acks from Al or
> > something.
> 
> iomap came in through the XFS tree originally, and has been very much
> maintained in combo, even though we now have another user with gfs.
> 
> Maybe we just need to make that official in MAINTAINERS?

Yes, though who should be the official maintainer?  You wrote most of
the iomap code; do you want to maintain it yourself?  Or have people
funnel them wherever XFS patches go? :)

--D