[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1812131833430.2735@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:42:45 +0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
CC: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, <tg@...bsd.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
"H. J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, <x32@...ldd.debian.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: Can we drop upstream Linux x32 support?
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Similarly, we could have integer types with trap representations.
C++2a will require two's complement representation for integer types, with
no trap representations (other than for bool, where only 0 and 1 are valid
representations). It seems very plausible that C will follow.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@...esourcery.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists