[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60C7B565-9009-4070-A632-8C982B692806@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 19:27:45 +0000
From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"jeyu@...nel.org" <jeyu@...nel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"Dock, Deneen T" <deneen.t.dock@...el.com>,
"kristen@...ux.intel.com" <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] modules: Add new special vfree flags
> On Dec 13, 2018, at 11:02 AM, Edgecombe, Rick P <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 23:40 +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On Dec 11, 2018, at 4:03 PM, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Add new flags for handling freeing of special permissioned memory in
>>> vmalloc,
>>> and remove places where the handling was done in module.c.
>>>
>>> This will enable this flag for all architectures.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/module.c | 43 ++++++++++++-------------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> I count on you for merging your patch-set with mine, since clearly they
>> conflict.
> Yes, I can rebase on top of yours if you omit the changes around module_memfree
> for your next version. It should fit together pretty cleanly for BPF and modules
> I think. Not sure what you are planning for kprobes and ftrace.
Are you asking after looking at the latest version of my patch-set?
Kprobes is done and ack'd. ftrace needs to be broken into two separate
changes (setting x after writing, and using text_poke interfaces), unless
Steven ack’s them. The changes introduce some overhead (3x), but I think it
is a reasonable slowdown for a debug feature.
Can you have a look at the series I’ve sent and let me know which patches
to drop? It would be best (for me) if the two series are fully merged.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists