[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9DA525B5@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:31:19 +0000
From: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
Alex Lemberg <Alex.Lemberg@....com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: revamp string descriptor reading
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Altman [mailto:Avri.Altman@....com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 18:18
> To: Winkler, Tomas <tomas.winkler@...el.com>; James E . J . Bottomley
> <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>; Martin K . Petersen
> <martin.petersen@...cle.com>; Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>;
> Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>; Vivek Gautam
> <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>; Subhash Jadavani
> <subhashj@...eaurora.org>; Alex Lemberg <Alex.Lemberg@....com>; linux-
> scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: revamp string descriptor reading
>
> Hello Tomas,
>
> >
> > Define new a type: uc_string_id for easier string handling and less
> > casting. Reduce number or string copies in price of a dynamic
> > allocation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
>
> Just one nit - doesn't really matters.
>
> Cheers,
> Avri
>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c | 20 ++---
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 9 +-
> > 4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>
>
> >
> > ufs_fixup_device_setup(hba, &card);
> > + ufs_put_device_desc(&card);
> ufs_get_device_desc() and ufs_put_device_desc() actually serves the quirks
> setup.
> Make sense to call it from within so the logic is clear and in one place.
> Might also save ufs_put_device_desc().
You are right from the current perspective , just I'd need it also for the RPMB patches that should follow,
then it will have bit larger span than the quirks.
Thanks
Tomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists