lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WC7UQnNsbqwevhxML2Xmq3z4c7uiJ8ddn4tE2H3zAHZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:05:18 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     sibis@...eaurora.org
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        tsoni@...eaurora.org, clew@...eaurora.org, akdwived@...eaurora.org,
        Ohad Ben Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Add power-domain bindings
 for Q6V5

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:08 PM Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt
> index 14947562bc67..bd9f4882fcf0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt
> @@ -75,6 +75,17 @@ on the Qualcomm Hexagon core.
>         Definition: reference to the regulators to be held on behalf of the
>                     booting of the Hexagon core
>
> +- power-domains:
> +       Usage: required

Assuming I understand correctly, presumably you want to say that it's
required to list _either_ power-domains or supplies.  Right now you
have the bindings saying that you need both regulators and
power-domains on all boards.


> +       Value type: <phandle>
> +       Definition: reference to the cx, mx and mss power-domains to be held on
> +                   behalf of the booting the Hexagon core
> +
> +- power-domain-names:
> +       Usage: required
> +       Value type: <stringlist>
> +       Definition: must be "cx", "mx", "mss"

Comparing to the patch you posted at
<https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181127085828.17908-1-sibis@codeaurora.org>,
it seems like maybe you also need "aop" listed here?



-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ