linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ntb_hw_switchtec: Added support of >=4G memory windows

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 19:25:53 -0500
From:   Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc:     wesley.sheng@...rochip.com,
        Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ntb@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        wesleyshenggit@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ntb_hw_switchtec: Added support of >=4G memory windows

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 7:01 PM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018-12-12 4:57 p.m., Jon Mason wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 6:42 PM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2018-12-12 4:00 p.m., Jon Mason wrote:
> >>> So, you based your patches on a series of patches not in the
> >>> ntb/ntb-next branch?  Please don't do this.  I see nothing in these
> >>> patches which requires that series, which makes this even more
> >>> unnecessary.  Since these are fairly trivial, I'm taking them and
> >>> pushing to the ntb-next branch to give these more time to be tested
> >>> (due to not being tested on the proper branch).  I would really
> >>> appreciate you testing the ntb-next branch as a sanity check.
> >>
> >> The NTB test tools don't work with switchtec hardware without that patch
> >> set, so there's no way to test the changes without that branch.
> >
> > Then let's get those patches in.  IIRC, I asked you to split up the
> > patch series to be bugfixes and features (or at least reorder the
> > series so I can split it up that way in my branches).  Also, I think
> > Serge had some comments that may/may not need to be addressed.  Could
> > you please reorder and resend (and Serge can comment as needed on the
> > resend)?
>
> I resent a while back and responded to all the feedback. Every patch in
> that series fixes a bug. None of them add features.

Per https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/12/552, I asked the series be split
up and the comments to be cleaned-up.  You repushed without addressing
this (or Serge's comments), which caused me to ignore the series.
Again, I'm happy to take it as a single series and split it up on my
end, I just need the patches reordered to have the bugfixes I
specified in the front to allow for this to be easily done.

Alternatively, you can rebase and resend them as-is to the ntb mailing
list and we can rehash it out there.

Thanks,
Jon

>
> Logan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-ntb" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-ntb+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to linux-ntb@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-ntb/ff7019a0-bac2-2de2-d06c-d54a82286b90%40deltatee.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.