[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181213004009.GK6707@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:40:09 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc: "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...mer.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Graph fixes for using multiple
endpoints per port
* Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com> [181213 00:24]:
> (snip)
> > foo = <&ep 0>;
> > bar = <&ep 1>;
>
> Ahh, it looks nice idea !
> but hmm..., it seems dtc doesn't allow us to use #address-cells = <2>
> for "remote-endpoint".
OK. Yeah let's scrap that then, it does not suit for
endpoints it seems. Thanks for checking.
> According to OF graph maintainer, he said that
> counting port / endpoint are not guaranteed,
> and we need to use "reg".
> (It is the reason of b6f3fc005a2c8b425d7a0973b43bef05890bf479)
>
> If you could double checked, and we could agreed
> that "reg" is the solution for us.
> I will post patches.
OK yes your "reg" proposal works for me.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists