linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] tee driver fix for v4.21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHUa44F=_DmhnvKxCAfErBcGL96=nmW0eSvgdhkF+pb+c-zhjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:29:06 +0100
From:   Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:     arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tee driver fix for v4.21

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:16 PM Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 01:28:00PM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > Hello arm-soc maintainers,
> >
> > Please pull this tee driver fix for a possible double list_del() in the
> > OP-TEE driver while uninitializing.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jens
> >
> > The following changes since commit 40e020c129cfc991e8ab4736d2665351ffd1468d:
> >
> >   Linux 4.20-rc6 (2018-12-09 15:31:00 -0800)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >   https://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git tags/tee-subsys-fix-for-4.21
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to b2d102bd0146d9eb1fa630ca0cd19a15ef2f74c8:
> >
> >   tee: optee: avoid possible double list_del() (2018-12-11 14:38:21 +0100)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Avoid possible double list_del in supplicant comms
> >
> > A fix for the OP-TEE driver to avoid possible double list_del during
> > tee-supplicant communication while the system is shutting down.
>
> Do you want this for 4.20 or 4.21? Seems like .20 material to me but the tag
> name is 4.21.

It's just that we're so late in the 4.20 cycle. If you're OK with
taking it now I'm happy with that.

Thanks,
Jens