lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOLK0pyKsS2hLagZ6pumMdfRokPig2P+KJambVOq7p+NU-OqgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:47:31 +0800
From:   Tianyu Lan <lantianyu1986@...il.com>
To:     paulus@...abs.org
Cc:     Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>, christoffer.dall@....com,
        marc.zyngier@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, jhogan@...nel.org,
        ralf@...ux-mips.org, paul.burton@...s.com,
        benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, bp@...en8.de,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        "linux-kernel@...r kernel org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
        vkuznets@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [Resend PATCH V5 7/10] KVM: Make kvm_set_spte_hva() return int

Hi Paul:
             Thanks for your review.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:03 PM Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 09:21:10PM +0800, lantianyu1986@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
> >
> > The patch is to make kvm_set_spte_hva() return int and caller can
> > check return value to determine flush tlb or not.
>
> It would be helpful if the patch description told the reader which
> return value(s) mean that the caller should flush the tlb.  I would
> guess that non-zero means to do the flush, but you should make that
> explicit.

OK. Thanks for suggestion and will update in the next version.

>
> > Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
>
> For the powerpc bits:
>
> Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>



-- 
Best regards
Tianyu Lan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ