lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR0402MB35705EF0F4A77BD7B0AAFDDD8CA00@AM0PR0402MB3570.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:57:31 +0000
From:   Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
To:     Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "andrew.smirnov@...il.com" <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
CC:     "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [v2] PCI: imx: make msi work without pcieportbus

Hi Lucas:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.stach@...gutronix.de]
> Sent: 2018年12月13日 17:19
> To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@....com; andrew.smirnov@...il.com
> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [v2] PCI: imx: make msi work without pcieportbus
> 
> Hi Richard,
> 
> Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2018, 08:02 +0000 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> > MSI_EN of iMX PCIe RC would be asserted when PCIEPORTBUS driver is
> > selected.
> > Thus, the MSI works fine on iMX PCIe before.
> > Assert it unconditionally when MSI is supported.
> > Otherwise, the MSI wouldn't be triggered although the EP is present
> > and the MSIs are assigned.
> 
> Thanks for digging into this issue. This seems like the right way forward.
> However, did you test this with devices using legacy IRQs?
> I.e. booting with "nomsi" on the kernel command line to see if legacy IRQs still
> work if this bit is set, or if we need to avoid setting this when the user
> explicitly requests to disable MSIs?
> 
> Regards,
> Lucas
> 
[Richard Zhu] Thanks for your review.
The Legacy INTx is broken.
The MSI_EN bit shouldn't be asserted when the user explicitly requests to disable MSIs.

BTW, regarding to Baruch's comments, it seems that all the (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI) check in
 the dwc host drivers are not required anymore, since the depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN, right?


> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > index 26087b3..d3e4296 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> > >  #define PHY_PLL_LOCK_WAIT_USLEEP_MAX	200
> >
> >  /* PCIe Root Complex registers (memory-mapped) */
> > > +#define PCI_MSI_CAP				0x50
> > >  #define PCIE_RC_LCR				0x7c
> > >  #define PCIE_RC_LCR_MAX_LINK_SPEEDS_GEN1	0x1
> > >  #define PCIE_RC_LCR_MAX_LINK_SPEEDS_GEN2	0x2
> > @@ -926,6 +927,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > >  	struct resource *dbi_base;
> > >  	struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> > >  	int ret;
> > > +	u16 val;
> >
> > >  	imx6_pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*imx6_pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >  	if (!imx6_pcie)
> > @@ -1070,6 +1072,11 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	ret = imx6_add_pcie_port(imx6_pcie, pdev);
> > >  	if (ret < 0)
> > >  		return ret;
> > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> > > +		val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, PCI_MSI_CAP +
> PCI_MSI_FLAGS);
> > > +		val |= PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE;
> > > +		dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, PCI_MSI_CAP + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, val);
> > > +	}
> >
> > >  	return 0;
> >  }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ