linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq HW driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181213101417.dcz66dpbqzbbxkdz@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:44:17 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        skannan@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        evgreen@...gle.com, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq
 HW driver

On 13-12-18, 02:12, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> It's on a v4.19 kernel with this cpufreq hw driver backported to it. I
> think all it takes is to return an error the second time the policy is
> initialized when cpufreq_online() calls into the cpufreq driver.

What do you mean by "the second time the policy is initialized" ?

We call cpufreq_online() only once for each policy.

-- 
viresh