[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR0402MB3570AE67BDF0391481EC13998CA00@AM0PR0402MB3570.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:21:11 +0000
From: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"andrew.smirnov@...il.com" <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
CC: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [v2] PCI: imx: make msi work without pcieportbus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.stach@...gutronix.de]
> Sent: 2018年12月13日 18:07
> To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@....com; andrew.smirnov@...il.com
> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [v2] PCI: imx: make msi work without pcieportbus
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2018, 09:57 +0000 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> > Hi Lucas:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.stach@...gutronix.de]
> > > Sent: 2018年12月13日 17:19
> > > > > > > To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> > > lorenzo.pieralisi@....com; andrew.smirnov@...il.com
> > > > > > > Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org;
> > > > > > > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [v2] PCI: imx: make msi work without pcieportbus
> > >
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2018, 08:02 +0000 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> > > > MSI_EN of iMX PCIe RC would be asserted when PCIEPORTBUS driver is
> > > > selected.
> > > > Thus, the MSI works fine on iMX PCIe before.
> > > > Assert it unconditionally when MSI is supported.
> > > > Otherwise, the MSI wouldn't be triggered although the EP is
> > > > present and the MSIs are assigned.
> > >
> > > Thanks for digging into this issue. This seems like the right way forward.
> > > However, did you test this with devices using legacy IRQs?
> > > I.e. booting with "nomsi" on the kernel command line to see if
> > > legacy IRQs still work if this bit is set, or if we need to avoid
> > > setting this when the user explicitly requests to disable MSIs?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Lucas
> > >
> >
> > [Richard Zhu] Thanks for your review.
> > The Legacy INTx is broken.
> > The MSI_EN bit shouldn't be asserted when the user explicitly requests to
> disable MSIs.
>
> Okay, so this patch should be extended with a check for
> pci_msi_enabled() to see if the user explicitly want legacy IRQs.
>
> > BTW, regarding to Baruch's comments, it seems that all the
> > (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI) check in
> > the dwc host drivers are not required anymore, since the depends on
> PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN, right?
>
> That's correct. This is mostly a historical artifact from the time when we
> were able to build without MSI support. Those checks could be cleaned up
> now that we depend on the MSI options.
>
[Richard Zhu] Great. Thanks Baruch and Lucas.
I would send the v3 patch a moment later with the pci_msi_enabled() check when
assert the MSI_EN of RC.
Best Regards
Richard Zhu
> Regards,
> Lucas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists