linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix dma-buf/udmabuf selftest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181213102521.tunzbhq4rk5loxk2@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:25:22 +0100
From:   Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To:     shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tom Murphy <murphyt7@....ie>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix dma-buf/udmabuf selftest

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:15:49PM -0700, shuah wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 11/27/18 3:33 AM, Tom Murphy wrote:
> > This patch fixes the udmabuf selftest. Currently the selftest is broken.
> > I fixed the selftest by setting the F_SEAL_SHRINK seal on the memfd
> > file descriptor which is required by udmabuf and added the test to
> > the selftest Makefile.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Murphy <murphyt7@....ie>
> 
> Does this change look good you? I plan to get this in for 4.21-rc1. Let me
> know if you have any objections.

Yes, it's fine.

Reviewed-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>