[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181213104247.kosguuoukoi645pf@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:12:47 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Nick Fan <nick.fan@...iatek.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
tfiga@...omium.org, Chiawen.Lee@...iatek.com, erin.lo@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Add API for getting voltage from supplies
On 13-12-18, 18:36, Nick Fan wrote:
> This new API is suitable for the users that required to access for
> multiple regulators. And I am one of users who uses this API, but I am
> not able to upstream the GPU kernel driver which uses the new API.
Look at it from mainline's perspective..
- We don't (can't) care about non-mainline stuff. Actually we do care,
but we can't add code to mainline which is not going to be used by
any mainline user.
- I am fine with introducing the new API, but that will happen only if
there is going to be a mainline user as well.
- As you are going to maintain your GPU driver offline, you can
maintain this patch too.
Sorry Nick.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists