linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:12:22 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64
 tree

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 05:01:07PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   4ab215061554 ("arm64: Add memory hotplug support")
> 
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 
>   232619fcc076 ("lib/ioremap: ensure break-before-make is used for huge p4d mappings")
> 
> from the akpm-current tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index da513a1facf4,cf9a26d3d7f5..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@@ -1047,19 -1029,7 +1043,24 @@@ int pud_free_pmd_page(pud_t *pudp, unsi
>   	return 1;
>   }
>   
>  +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>  +int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, struct vmem_altmap *altmap,
>  +		    bool want_memblock)
>  +{
>  +	int flags = 0;
>  +
>  +	if (rodata_full || debug_pagealloc_enabled())
>  +		flags = NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
>  +
>  +	__create_pgd_mapping(swapper_pg_dir, start, __phys_to_virt(start),
>  +			     size, PAGE_KERNEL, pgd_pgtable_alloc, flags);
>  +
>  +	return __add_pages(nid, start >> PAGE_SHIFT, size >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>  +			   altmap, want_memblock);
>  +}
>  +#endif
> ++
> + int p4d_free_pud_page(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr)
> + {
> + 	return 0;	/* Don't attempt a block mapping */
> + }

Looks good to me, thanks.

Will