linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Add support for O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1544703412.6703.46.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 07:16:52 -0500
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>,
        Philippe Trébuchet 
        <philippe.trebuchet@....gouv.fr>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Thibaut Sautereau <thibaut.sautereau@....gouv.fr>,
        Vincent Strubel <vincent.strubel@....gouv.fr>,
        Yves-Alexis Perez <yves-alexis.perez@....gouv.fr>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Add support for O_MAYEXEC

[Cc'ing linux-integrity]

On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 12:26 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mimi Zohar:
> 
> > The indication needs to be set during file open, before the open
> > returns to the caller.  This is the point where ima_file_check()
> > verifies the file's signature.  On failure, access to the file is
> > denied.
> 
> Does this verification happen for open with O_PATH?

Interesting!  According to the manpage, userspace cannot read/write to
the file.  It looks like do_o_path() intentionally skips do_last(),
with the call to ima_file_check().  If the file data isn't being
accessed, does the file's integrity need to be verified?

Mimi