linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQL0jkm6UkQkppcW7bNzw8bvr-FZQi3fP6oJRCcdGiYZ6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:20:59 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     bvanassche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 3:45 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
>
> Are you aware of Linus' opinion about rebasing? If not, please have a look
> at https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/26/71 or https://lwn.net/Articles/328436/.

very much aware.
above is not applicable to this use case.