Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 21:09:49 +0800
From:   leo.yan@...aro.org
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Coresight ML <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Robert Walker <robert.walker@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] perf cs-etm: Treat NO_SYNC element as trace
 discontinuity

Hi Arnaldo,

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:41:54AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:38:54AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 03:38:26PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> > > CoreSight tracer driver might insert barrier packet between different
> > > buffers, thus the decoder can spot the boundaries based on the barrier
> > > packet; the decoder is possible to hit a barrier packet and emit a
> > > NO_SYNC element, then the decoder will find a periodic synchronisation
> > > point inside that next trace block that starts trace again but does not
> > > have the TRACE_ON element as indicator - usually because this block of
> > > trace has wrapped the buffer so we have lost the original point that
> > > trace was enabled.
> > > 
> > > In upper case, it results in the trace stream only inserts the
> > > OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC element in the middle of tracing stream, but
> > > we don't handle NO_SYNC element properly and at the end users miss to
> > > see the info for trace discontinuity.
> > 
> > 
> > "In upper case"? Maybe:
> > 
> > In the former case it causes the insertion of a OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC
> > in the middle of the the tracing stream, but as we were npt handling the
> > NO_SYNC element properly which ends up making users miss the
> > discontinuity indication"?
> 
> > > Though OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC is different from CS_ETM_TRACE_ON when
> > > output from the decoder, but both of them indicate the trace data is
> > 
> > can we remove the "but" and "of them" (redundant) above?
> > 
> > > discontinuous; this patch treats OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC as trace
> >                                                                a
> > > discontinuity and generates CS_ETM_DISCONTINUITY packet for it, so
> > > cs-etm can handle discontinuity for this case, finally it saves the last
> >                        it (way too many "discontinuity")
> > > trace data for previous trace block and restart samples for new block.
> 
> I've tentatively done those changes (and a few more) in my local branch,
> resulting in the wording below, plese let me know if you are ok with it:

Very appreciate your helping.  Please see some minor typos in below
commit:

> commit 148068b45fe2e93b19c06cfc1140ea12ca72eb59
> Author: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> Date:   Tue Dec 11 15:38:26 2018 +0800
> 
>     perf cs-etm: Treat NO_SYNC element as trace discontinuity
>     
>     The CoreSight tracer driver might insert a barrier packets between
                                                         packet
>     different buffers, thus the decoder can spot the boundaries based on the
>     barrier packet; it is possible for the decoder to hit a barrier packet
>     and emit a NO_SYNC element, then the decoder will find a periodic
>     synchronisation point inside that next trace block that starts the trace
>     again but does not have the TRACE_ON element as indicator - usually
>     because this trace block has wrapped the buffer so we have lost the
>     original point when the trace was enabled.
>     
>     In the first case it causes the insertion of a OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC
             former
>     in the middle of the the tracing stream, but as we were npt handling the
                                                              not
>     NO_SYNC element properly which ends up making users miss the
>     discontinuity indication"?
                              s/?/.

Thanks a lot for helping.  If you prefer me to resend the patch set,
also let me know.

>     Though OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC is different from CS_ETM_TRACE_ON when
>     output from the decoder, both indicate that the trace data is
>     discontinuous; this patch treats OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC as a trace
>     discontinuity and generates a CS_ETM_DISCONTINUITY packet for it, so
>     cs-etm can handle the discontinuity for this case, finally it saves the
>     last trace data for the previous trace block and restart samples for the
>     new block.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
>     Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>     Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
>     Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>     Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
>     Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>     Cc: Robert Walker <robert.walker@....com>
>     Cc: coresight ml <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>
>     Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>     Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1544513908-16805-7-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org
>     Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
> index 1039f364f4cc..bee026e76a4c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c
> @@ -410,7 +410,6 @@ static ocsd_datapath_resp_t cs_etm_decoder__gen_trace_elem_printer(
>  	case OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_UNKNOWN:
>  		break;
>  	case OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_NO_SYNC:
> -		break;
>  	case OCSD_GEN_TRC_ELEM_TRACE_ON:
>  		resp = cs_etm_decoder__buffer_discontinuity(decoder,
>  							    trace_chan_id);
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists