linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] [tty] c96cf923a9: WARNING:possible_circular_locking_dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:19:26 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>, lkp@...org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [tty] c96cf923a9:
 WARNING:possible_circular_locking_dependency_detected

On (12/12/18 14:54), Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > In this particular case we probably can just move free_page()
> > out of uart_port lock scope. Note that free_page()->MM can printk()
> > on its own.
> > 
> > 
> > Something like this (not tested):
> 
> Looks good to me.
> Probably, it's worth to update comment about freeing just to make sure
> no one will "refactor"/"simplify" it some day.
> 
> Does it make sense to add this to your patch?

Makes perfect sense, thanks! I'll send a patch a bit later.

	-ss