linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 3/3] regulator: mcp16502: add regulator driver for MCP16502

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181213162141.GQ10669@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:21:41 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andrei.Stefanescu@...rochip.com
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andr3i.stefanescu@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 3/3] regulator: mcp16502: add regulator driver
 for MCP16502

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:19:16PM +0000, Andrei.Stefanescu@...rochip.com wrote:

> I tried with both suspend_late/resume_early and suspend_noirq/resume_noirq.
> Everything seems to work ok.

> Which one do you think is more appropriate? I am guessing that during
> suspend_late some devices may still need to be turned on and that it would
> be the safest during suspend_noirq.

I agree, noirq is going to be the safest option.  Can you respin with
that please?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)