[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f81d636-95da-af77-0a7c-0ad439c0a866@deltatee.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:46:13 -0700
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Wesley Sheng <wesley.sheng@...rochip.com>
Cc: kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wesleyshenggit@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] switchtec: MRPC DMA mode implementation
On 2018-12-13 8:17 a.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> static void init_pff(struct switchtec_dev *stdev)
>> @@ -1294,6 +1367,19 @@ static int switchtec_init_pci(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
>>
>> pci_set_drvdata(pdev, stdev);
>>
>> + if (!use_dma_mrpc)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (!(ioread32(&stdev->mmio_mrpc->dma_ver) ? true : false))
>> + return 0;
>
> This is ... harder to decode than necessary. It's obvious that the
> intent is to return if the adapter firmware doesn't support DMA, but I
> lost interest before I could verify that it works as intended.
Oh, ick, yes. I must have missed that in my review.
@Wesley, that would definitely be something worth cleaning up. That
ternary operator doesn't make any sense.
Thanks, Bjorn, for the review and picking up the series.
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists