[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181214181056.GA17941@ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 19:10:56 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: zero memory returned from dma_alloc_*
Hi Christoph,
I stumbled upon this one:
#define __get_dma_pages(gfp_mask, order) \
__get_free_pages((gfp_mask) | GFP_DMA, (order))
(include/linux/gfp.h)
Should it also have the __GFP_ZERO treatment?
Or maybe this is already done in your tree..
As for the sparc bits:
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> [sparc]
Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists