[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrV0fVLZKG6JrOvzvOzP06UxhZW=LbHpPXbonoeFdPJB1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:24:28 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: thomas@...oebel-theuer.de
Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
"H. J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
x32@...ldd.debian.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Can we drop upstream Linux x32 support?
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 1:22 PM Thomas Schöbel-Theuer
<thomas@...oebel-theuer.de> wrote:
>
> On 12/11/18 02:23, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > I'm seriously considering sending a patch to remove x32 support from
> > upstream Linux.
>
> I am downstream maintainer of several self-patched kernels at 1&1 Ionos.
> The kernels are rolled out to several tenthousands of production servers
> running in several datacenters and in multiple continents.
>
> Currently, we have a few thousands of servers relying on 32bit ABIs in
> some thousands of VMs and/or containers of various types (LXC, OpenVZ, etc).
I should clarify again: I am not suggesting that we drop 32-bit
support in the forseeable future. (Well, I might eventually suggest
that we drop support for 32-bit *hardware* at some point, but not for
32-bit compat software.) Linux's compat code is quite robust and is
even fairly maintainable.
I'm talking about x32, which is a different beast.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists