[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35905587-2d7b-c0ab-e081-2b938d60e881@schoebel-theuer.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 22:41:20 +0100
From: Thomas Schöbel-Theuer <thomas@...oebel-theuer.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
"H. J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
x32@...ldd.debian.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Can we drop upstream Linux x32 support?
On 12/14/18 22:24, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I should clarify again: I am not suggesting that we drop 32-bit
> support in the forseeable future. (Well, I might eventually suggest
> that we drop support for 32-bit *hardware* at some point, but not for
> 32-bit compat software.) Linux's compat code is quite robust and is
> even fairly maintainable.
>
> I'm talking about x32, which is a different beast.
>
OK, this does not really make a big difference for large-scale
enterprise users. Some day in the very distant future any legacy system
will disappear, eventually.
So from my viewpoint the mentioned roadmap / timing requirements will
remain the same, whatever you are dropping.
Enterprise-critical use cases will probably need to be migrated to
KVM/qemu together with their old kernel versions, anyway (because the
original hardware will be no longer available in a few decades).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists