linux-kernel - [RESEND PATCH v4 2/3] fs: Don't need to put list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1544824384-17668-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:53:03 -0500
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        "Wangkai (Kevin C)" <wangkai86@...wei.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/3] fs: Don't need to put list_lru into its own cacheline

The list_lru structure is essentially just a pointer to a table of
per-node LRU lists. Even if CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is defined, the list
field is just used for LRU list registration and shrinker_id is set
at initialization. Those fields won't need to be touched that often.

So there is no point to make the list_lru structures to sit in their
own cachelines.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
---
 include/linux/fs.h | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index c95c080..7707c4a 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1474,11 +1474,12 @@ struct super_block {
 	struct user_namespace *s_user_ns;
 
 	/*
-	 * Keep the lru lists last in the structure so they always sit on their
-	 * own individual cachelines.
+	 * The list_lru structure is essentially just a pointer to a table
+	 * of per-node lru lists, each of which has its own spinlock.
+	 * There is no need to put them into separate cachelines.
 	 */
-	struct list_lru		s_dentry_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
-	struct list_lru		s_inode_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+	struct list_lru		s_dentry_lru;
+	struct list_lru		s_inode_lru;
 	struct rcu_head		rcu;
 	struct work_struct	destroy_work;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1