lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181214225428.GL11710@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 23:54:28 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Thomas Schöbel-Theuer <thomas@...oebel-theuer.de>
Cc:     Thomas Schoebel-Theuer <tst@...oebel-theuer.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi / apei: fix NULL deref during init

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:42:01PM +0100, Thomas Schöbel-Theuer wrote:
> Ah, I overlooked that commit e56c92565dfe2 is already providing a different
> solution to the same problem in newer kernels _only_, as a _side_ effect
> (not clear to me from the description, but clear from reading the code).

Damn, I missed the fact that this is not the upstream kernel:

CPU: 0 PID: 1 UID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.0-ui18344.004-uiabi1-infong-amd64 #1

> So another alternative would be backporting e56c92565dfe2 to the 4.4 LTS
> series. Also fine for me.

That looks like the right fix.

A note for the next time: do not send a fix for a stable kernel which is
not upstream:

>From Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst:

" - It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree (upstream)."

The stable kernels track upstream so if a stable kernel has a problem,
the first thing one needs to do is to check whether this has been fixed
upstream and if so, to backport it. This is the case most of the time.
In the very seldom cases where a separate fix is needed, it needs to be
handled by asking Greg what to do. :-)

Adding stable@ folks to CC to set me straight if I'm missing something.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ