[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19c273d9-c52d-48be-a1e1-88e2b1f14cce@xilinx.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:50:43 +0100
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Maruthi Srinivas Bayyavarapu 
        <maruthi.srinivas.bayyavarapu@...inx.com>
CC:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Vishal Sagar <vsagar@...inx.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: xlnx: Add i2s driver
Hi Mark,
On 13. 12. 18 16:31, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 12:02:37AM +0530, Maruthi Srinivas Bayyavarapu wrote:
> 
>> @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Xilinx ASoC I2S audio support
>> + *
> 
> This looks otherwise good so I've applied it but please send a followup
> patch converting the entire comment block to C++ style so this looks
> more consistent.
Is it the rule for your subsystems? Or did it come from any generic
agreement how this should be handled in .c files?
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
