[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181214103805.GB11710@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:38:05 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, keescook@...omium.org, msys.mizuma@...il.com,
indou.takao@...fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/6] x86/boot: Introduce kstrtoull() to boot
directory instead of simple_strtoull()
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 09:34:21AM +0800, Chao Fan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:26:03PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:03:12PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> >> Surely, using the old simple_strtoull() is fine too, we can take its
> >> replacement into TODO list.
> >
> >Yes, that would be nice.
>
> Thanks, then I can use simple_strtoull() for now.
I don't understand - patch 1 in your v13 has kstrtoull() added to
boot/string.c. Why are you reverting back to simple_strtoull()?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists