linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/panel: Add Feiyang FY07024DI26A30-D MIPI-DSI LCD panel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMty3ZCkGudTL9NLnWjTPD8+xqEzY2d0oLN9x=64Hk8MzKTM5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:35:11 +0530
From:   Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To:     Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
        TL Lim <tllim@...e64.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/panel: Add Feiyang FY07024DI26A30-D MIPI-DSI
 LCD panel

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 1:25 AM Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:56:03AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 8:37 PM Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:09:15PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > Feiyang FY07024DI26A30-D is 1024x600, 4-lane MIPI-DSI LCD panel.
> > > >
> > > > Add panel driver for it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  MAINTAINERS                                   |   6 +
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig                 |   9 +
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile                |   1 +
> > > >  .../drm/panel/panel-feiyang-fy07024di26a30d.c | 286 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  4 files changed, 302 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-feiyang-fy07024di26a30d.c
> > > >
>
> /snip
>
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-feiyang-fy07024di26a30d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-feiyang-fy07024di26a30d.c
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..a4b46bd8fdbe
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-feiyang-fy07024di26a30d.c
>
> /snip
>
> > > > +static int feiyang_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct feiyang *ctx = panel_to_feiyang(panel);
> > > > +     struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> > > > +     unsigned int i;
> > > > +     int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +     ret = regulator_enable(ctx->dvdd);
> > > > +     if (ret)
> > > > +             return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +     msleep(100);
> > >
> > > nit: You should do your best to correlate the sleeps with the timing parameters
> > > from the datasheet with a comment.
> > >
> > > ie:
> > >         /* T1: > 100ms */
> > >         msleep(100);
> >
> > Sorry, what does this mean?
>
> On page 9 of the datasheet you sent me [1], it has the delays required to safely
> power up the panel. This delay is the time between dvdd going high and avdd
> going high. On the figure in the datasheet, this would be T2 (T1 is dvdd rise

time between dvdd going high and avdd going high is T1 + T3 right?

T2 > 0ms
T3 > 20ms

In this case the delay can be msleep(20) ?

> time and should be handled in the regulator subsystem (iirc)). Also according to
> the datasheet, T2 just needs to be > 0, so you don't even need this delay. You
> could replace this with a comment like:
>
>         /* T1 (dvdd rise time) + T2 (dvdd->avdd) > 0 */
>
> So for all of the msleeps below you should get the delays from the datasheet and
> add a comment referencing them.

T5 and T6 are delay between avdd to reset enable it can be 10 + 10
=&gt; 20ms and finally T12 which is 200 after reset.

What about the delay between resets, I need to understand it a bit.