lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181214115749.382334320@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:59:03 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 058/142] bpf: allocate local storage buffers using GFP_ATOMIC

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 569a933b03f3c48b392fe67c0086b3a6b9306b5a ]

Naresh reported an issue with the non-atomic memory allocation of
cgroup local storage buffers:

[   73.047526] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
/srv/oe/build/tmp-rpb-glibc/work-shared/intel-corei7-64/kernel-source/mm/slab.h:421
[   73.060915] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 3157, name: test_cgroup_sto
[   73.068342] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[   73.072293] CPU: 2 PID: 3157 Comm: test_cgroup_sto Not tainted
4.20.0-rc2-next-20181113 #1
[   73.080548] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS
2.0b 07/27/2017
[   73.088018] Call Trace:
[   73.090463]  dump_stack+0x70/0xa5
[   73.093783]  ___might_sleep+0x152/0x240
[   73.097619]  __might_sleep+0x4a/0x80
[   73.101191]  __kmalloc_node+0x1cf/0x2f0
[   73.105031]  ? cgroup_storage_update_elem+0x46/0x90
[   73.109909]  cgroup_storage_update_elem+0x46/0x90

cgroup_storage_update_elem() (as well as other update map update
callbacks) is called with disabled preemption, so GFP_ATOMIC
allocation should be used: e.g. alloc_htab_elem() in hashtab.c.

Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
index 830d7f095748..fc1605aee5ea 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
@@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ static int cgroup_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key,
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	new = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_storage_buffer) +
-			   map->value_size, __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER,
+			   map->value_size,
+			   __GFP_ZERO | GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN,
 			   map->numa_node);
 	if (!new)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.19.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ