[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181214115747.617053615@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:58:19 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 014/142] tcp: Do not underestimate rwnd_limited
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit 41727549de3e7281feb174d568c6e46823db8684 ]
If available rwnd is too small, tcp_tso_should_defer()
can decide it is worth waiting before splitting a TSO packet.
This really means we are rwnd limited.
Fixes: 5615f88614a4 ("tcp: instrument how long TCP is limited by receive window")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -2338,8 +2338,11 @@ static bool tcp_write_xmit(struct sock *
} else {
if (!push_one &&
tcp_tso_should_defer(sk, skb, &is_cwnd_limited,
- max_segs))
+ max_segs)) {
+ if (!is_cwnd_limited)
+ is_rwnd_limited = true;
break;
+ }
}
limit = mss_now;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists