[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrvrN6+sVGc1sM+hmQo=JR=8FyAz_YRK9DzEQN2jOVX6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:36:07 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Intel graphics driver community testing & development"
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915: Move to new PM core fields
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 15:22, Vincent Guittot
<vincent.guittot@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> With jiffies been replaced by raw ns in PM core accounting, 915 driver is
> updated to use this new time infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 12 ++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> index d6c8f8f..cf6437d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> @@ -493,14 +493,14 @@ static u64 get_rc6(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> */
> if (kdev->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDED) {
> if (!i915->pmu.sample[__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_ESTIMATED].cur)
> - i915->pmu.suspended_jiffies_last =
> - kdev->power.suspended_jiffies;
> + i915->pmu.suspended_time_last =
> + kdev->power.suspended_time;
>
Huh, so patch 2 introduces a complier error because of removing the
old fields. We can't have that.
Ideally the driver shouldn't touch these fields in the first place,
but because the fields are defined in a public header, there is always
a risk that they becomes abused. I would appreciate if we can change
the driver move away from using these fields and make that a patch
preceding patch 2.
> - val = kdev->power.suspended_jiffies -
> - i915->pmu.suspended_jiffies_last;
> - val += jiffies - kdev->power.accounting_timestamp;
> + val = kdev->power.suspended_time -
> + i915->pmu.suspended_time_last;
> + val += ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) -
> + kdev->power.accounting_timestamp;
>
> - val = jiffies_to_nsecs(val);
> val += i915->pmu.sample[__I915_SAMPLE_RC6].cur;
>
> i915->pmu.sample[__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_ESTIMATED].cur = val;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> index 7f164ca..3dc2a30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ struct i915_pmu {
> */
> struct i915_pmu_sample sample[__I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS];
> /**
> - * @suspended_jiffies_last: Cached suspend time from PM core.
> + * @suspended_time_last: Cached suspend time from PM core.
> */
> - unsigned long suspended_jiffies_last;
> + u64 suspended_time_last;
> /**
> * @i915_attr: Memory block holding device attributes.
> */
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists